FRANLOGIC SCOUT DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al v. SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC.
ORDER THE PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 1 ) IS DENIED. RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 2 ) IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/12/17. 7/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANLOGIC SCOUT DEVELOPMENT,
LLC, et al.
SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC.,
AND NOW, this 12th day of July 2017, upon consideration of Petitioners Franlogic
Scout Development LLC, Ed Samane, Lisa Kornstein, Howard Soloway, and Steve Pruitts’
Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 1), Respondent Scott Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss the Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 2), Petitioners’ Response in Opposition to
the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7), Respondent’s Reply (Doc. No. 8), Petitioners’ Supplemental
Brief (Doc. No. 13), Respondent’s Supplemental Brief (Doc. No. 14), arguments made by
counsel for the parties at the hearing held on February 7, 2017, and in accordance with the
Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 2)
3. This case shall be closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?