STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT INDIVIOR INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 305 IN 13-MD-2445; DOC. NO. 138 IN 16-CV-5073) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT INDIVIOR SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/8/2017. 9/8/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 396 IN 13-MD-2445) (ems)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
:
IN RE SUBOXONE (BUPRENORPHINE
:
MDL NO. 2445
HYDROCHLORIDE AND NALOXONE)
:
13-MD-2445
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
:
:
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
:
:
Wisconsin, et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al.
:
Case No. 16-cv-5073
:
__________________________________________:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
:
By Attorney General Brad D. Schimel, et al.
:
:
CIV. A. NO. 16-5073
Plaintiffs,
:
v.
:
:
INDIVIOR INC. f/k/a RECKITT BENCKISER
:
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.
:
:
Defendants.
:
__________________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Indivior
Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 305; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 138), Plaintiffs’
Response in Opposition (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 325; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 165), Indivior’s Reply
Brief (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 337; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 175), Indivior’s Notice of Supplemental
Authority (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 392; 16-5073, Doc. No. 201), and Plaintiffs’ Response to
Indivior’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (16-5073, Doc. No. 203), it is hereby ORDERED that
the Motion is DENIED. Defendant Indivior shall file an answer to the Amended Complaint within
twenty (20) days from the date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
___________________________
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?