STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al

Filing 205

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT INDIVIOR INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 305 IN 13-MD-2445; DOC. NO. 138 IN 16-CV-5073) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT INDIVIOR SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/8/2017. 9/8/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 396 IN 13-MD-2445) (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : IN RE SUBOXONE (BUPRENORPHINE : MDL NO. 2445 HYDROCHLORIDE AND NALOXONE) : 13-MD-2445 ANTITRUST LITIGATION : : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : : Wisconsin, et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al. : Case No. 16-cv-5073 : __________________________________________: STATE OF WISCONSIN : By Attorney General Brad D. Schimel, et al. : : CIV. A. NO. 16-5073 Plaintiffs, : v. : : INDIVIOR INC. f/k/a RECKITT BENCKISER : PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. : : Defendants. : __________________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Indivior Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 305; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 138), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 325; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 165), Indivior’s Reply Brief (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 337; 16-cv-5073, Doc. No. 175), Indivior’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (13-MD-2445, Doc. No. 392; 16-5073, Doc. No. 201), and Plaintiffs’ Response to Indivior’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (16-5073, Doc. No. 203), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Defendant Indivior shall file an answer to the Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ___________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?