STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al

Filing 516

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PERTAINING TO SPECIFIC PLAINTIFFS AND REMEDIES ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 8/22/22. 8/22/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL.(mbh) (SEE 13MD2445; DOC #813)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-05073-MSG Document 516 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : IN RE SUBOXONE (BUPRENORPHINE : MDL NO. 2445 HYDROCHLORIDE AND NALOXONE) : 13-MD-2445 ANTITRUST LITIGATION : : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:, : : Wisconsin, et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al. : Case No. 16-cv-5073 : __________________________________________ : STATE OF WISCONSIN : By Attorney General Brad D. Schimel, et al. : : CIV. A. NO. 16-5073 Plaintiffs, : v. : : INDIVIOR INC. f/k/a RECKITT BENCKISER : PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. : : Defendants. : __________________________________________ : ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant Indivior Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims (MDL No. 13-2445, Doc. Nos. 699 and 706; Civ. A. No. 16-5073, Doc. No. 450), Defendant Indivior Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment Pertaining to Specific Plaintiffs and Remedies (MDL No. 13-2445, Doc. Nos. 699 and 706), the Direct Purchaser and End Payor Plaintiffs’ Response (MDL No. 13-2445, Doc. Nos. 731, 732, and 734), the Plaintiff States’ Response (Civ. A. No. 16-5073, Doc. Nos. 464, 465), and Indivior’s Reply (MDL No. 13-2445, Doc. No. 740; Civ. A. No. 16-5073, Doc. No. 469), and following oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg —————————————————— MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?