SODEXOMAGIC, LLC v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY

Filing 249

ORDER THAT DREXEL'S MOTION TO STRIKE WILL BE GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. SODEXO'S MOTION TO STRIKE WILL BE DENIED. DREXEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILL BE GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. SODEXO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG MENT WILL BE GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. COUNTS I,II,III, IV OF SODEXO'S COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED, COUNT V OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED IN PART, COUNT I OF DREXEL'S COUNTERCLAIMS WILL BE DISMISSED AND COUNT II OF DREXEL'S COUNTERCLAIMS WILL BE DISMISSED IN PART.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/2/2018. 8/2/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SODEXOMAGIC, LLC

CIVIL ACTION

v.

NO. 16-5144

DREXEL UNIVERSITY
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE
AND NOW, this second day of August, 2018, after review of the parties’ motions, the
submissions related thereto, and oral argument, and as discussed further in the Court’s
accompanying Memorandum, which details the specific portions of the parties’ claims that
remain in dispute, the Court rules as follows:
1. Drexel’s Motion to Strike (ECF 208) will be GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART,
2. Sodexo’s Motion to Strike (ECF 221) will be DENIED,
3. Drexel’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 220) will be GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART, and
4. Sodexo’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 200, 204) will be GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART.
As a result, Counts I, II, III, and IV of Sodexo’s Complaint will be DISMISSED, Count V
of Sodexo’s Supplemental Complaint will be DISMISSED IN PART, Count I of Drexel’s
Counterclaims will be DISMISSED, and Count II of Drexel’s Counterclaims will be
DISMISSED IN PART.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Dated: 8/2/18
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 16\16-5144 Sodexomagic v Drexel\16cv5144 Order re MSJ.docx

1