GLOUCESTER TERMINALS, LLC v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 929
ORDER THAT PETITIONERS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT NO. 10 ) IS DENIED. RESPONDENTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT NO. 9 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PETITIONER SHALL REINSTATE GARY AKERS WITH SENIORITY UNI MPAIRED AS OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2016, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEPTEMBER 13, 2016, ARBITRATION AWARD. BY JUNE 5, 2017, RESPONDENT SHALL BRIEF THE COURT ON THE METHOD FOR CALCULATING AKERSS BACK PAY FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 TO MAY 22, 2017. R ESPONDENT WILL ALSO BRIEF THE COURT ON WHETHER AKERS IS ENTITLED TO PREJUDGMENT INTEREST ON THE BACK PAY, AND ON THE METHOD FOR CALCULATING THAT INTEREST. PETITIONERS RESPONSE WILL BE DUE ON JUNE 19, 2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 5/22/17. 5/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GLOUCESTER TERMINALS, LLC,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 929,
ORDER & JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2017, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment (Document No. 9), Respondent’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(Document No. 10), and the parties’ responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Petitioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 10) is DENIED.
Respondent’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 9) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Petitioner shall REINSTATE Gary Akers with seniority unimpaired
September 13, 2016, in accordance with the September 13, 2016, arbitration award.
By June 5, 2017, Respondent shall brief the Court on the method for calculating
Akers’s back pay for the period from September 13, 2016 to May 22, 2017.
Respondent will also brief the Court on whether Akers is entitled to prejudgment
interest on the back pay, and on the method for calculating that interest. Petitioner’s
response will be due on June 19, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?