RODRIGUEZ v. MAY et al
Filing
14
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; RODRIGUEZ'S PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ARE DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY SEPARATE JUDGMENT, FILED CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THIS ORDER. NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/18/17. 7/18/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
CIVIL ACTION
v.
GERALD MAY et al
AND NOW this
NO. 16-cv-05353-LS
I(
day o f + · 2017, upon careful and
independent consideration of Juan Rodriguez's petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), the revised petition (Doc. No. 5), Juan
Rodriguez's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 5),
the Commonwealth's response in opposition (Doc. No. 11), and the Report and
Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Rodriguez's Petitions for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED and
DISMISSED without prejudice by separate Judgment, filed
contemporaneously with this Order. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
58(a); Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District
Courts, Rule 12;
3. No certificate of appealability shall issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)
because "the applicant has [not] made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right[,]" under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), since he has not
demonstrated that "reasonable jurists" would find my "assessment of the
constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
ENTERED
JUL 18 2017
CLERK OF COURT
484 (2000); see United States v. Cepero, 224 F.3d 256, 262-63 (3d Cir.
2000), abrogated on other grounds by Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134
(2012); and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this file closed.
BY THE COURT:
iJO&LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?