COX v. COLVIN

Filing 27

ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 12/18/18. 12/18/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONNA M. COX, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. : : : : : : : : Civ. No. 16-5434 JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, after careful and independent review of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Defendant’s Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review (Doc. No. 12), Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), Magistrate Judge Perkin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 21), and Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 25), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; and 4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond ______________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?