COX v. COLVIN
Filing
27
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 12/18/18. 12/18/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA M. COX,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 16-5434
JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, after careful and independent review of
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Defendant’s Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record
(Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review
(Doc. No. 12), Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. Nos. 16, 17),
Magistrate Judge Perkin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff’s Objections
(Doc. No. 21), and Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 25), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 21) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; and
4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
______________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?