E.G. et al v. GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/23/17. 5/23/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
E.G., et al
GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May 2017, upon considering Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment
(ECF Doc. No. 12), Defendant's Response (ECF Doc. No. 14), Defendant's Motion for Judgment
(ECF Doc. No. 14), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 15) and for reasons in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motions (ECF Doc. No. 12, 14) are GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part:
We affirm Hearing Officer Ford's detailed findings as to the school district's
actions after June 12, 2013;
We reverse and remand for a specific fine grained analysis of each of Plaintiffs'
claims before June 12, 2013;
Plaintiffs shall file a one-page status memorandum on the progress of resolution
following the remand on July 28, 2017 and every sixty (60) days thereafter until resolution or the
Hearing Officer issues a new decision; and,
The Clerk of Court shall close this matter.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?