JOHNSON et al v. SUNOCO, INC. et al

Filing 37

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND, AND ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND IN OPPOSITION THERETO IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/28/17. 3/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RUDOLPH AND LOIS JOHNSON v. SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), ET AL. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-05512 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of February , 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 20), and all documents submitted in support thereof, and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: ___________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?