JOHNSON et al v. SUNOCO, INC. et al

Filing 37

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND, AND ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND IN OPPOSITION THERETO IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/28/17. 3/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RUDOLPH AND LOIS JOHNSON
v.
SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), ET AL.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-05512

ORDER

AND NOW, this

28th day of

February

, 2017, upon consideration of

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 20), and all documents submitted in support thereof, and
in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:

___________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.