ASI BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC. v. OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 3 IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PLAINTIFF PROCEEDING ON THE UNDERLYING COMPLAINT OR SEEKING PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2017 IS HEREBY CANCELLED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM 52 , ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ASI BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.,
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL,
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2017, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint and attached exhibits
(ECF No. 1), Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
and Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Law in support
thereof (ECF Nos. 2, 3), Plaintiff’s Proposed Findings and Fact
and Conclusions of Law, along with a supporting Memorandum of
Law (ECF Nos. 39, 40), Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law, together with a Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Proposed Findings and Fact and
Conclusions of Law (ECF No. 43), and the parties’ letter
statements and responses regarding the scheduled preliminary
injunction hearing (ECF Nos. 45, 46, 47, 48), and following a
telephone conference held on the record with counsel for both
parties on February 7, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED, for the
reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, that Plaintiff’s
Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 3) is DENIED
without prejudice to the plaintiff proceeding on the underlying
complaint or seeking permanent injunctive relief. It is further
ORDERED that the preliminary injunction hearing previously
scheduled for February 14, 2017, is hereby CANCELLED for the
reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?