LOPEZ v. TRANSPORTATION WORKERS UNION LOCAL 234 et al
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 11 & 12) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. LOCAL 234'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 8) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/19/17. 6/19/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRANSPORTATION WORKERS UNION
LOCAL 234, et al.
AND NOW, on this 19th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 11 & 12), and Plaintiff Lopez’s Responses (ECF Nos. 13
& 14), it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part consistent with the following:
1. SEPTA’s Motion (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED with respect to Count I and Lopez’s
breach of contract claim is DISMISSED. SEPTA’s Motion is DENIED with
respect to Count III;
2. Local 234’s Second Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED with respect
to Count III and Lopez’s due process claim against Local 234 is DISMISSED.
Local 234’s Motion is DENIED with respect to Count II.
3. Local 234’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is DENIED as moot.7
Local 234 filed a Motion to Dismiss on January 17, 2017. (ECF No. 8.) Lopez filed an
Amended Complaint on January 24, and Local 234 filed a Second Motion to Dismiss on February 3,
(ECF No. 11), obviating the need for the Court to decide the January 17 Motion.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?