REHMEYER v. PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION et al

Filing 66

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT MODEL PATTERN COMPANY, INC. ("MP") TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [#58] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO REQUESTS 37,47,48, AND 49, TO THE EXTENT RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN PRODUCED, LIMITED TO THE PERIOD FROM 11/7/04 TO 11/7/14, CONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/4/17. 10/5/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOANNE REHMEYER : : : : : v. PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION, et al CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5690 ORDER AND NOW, this _4th__ day of October 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendant Model Pattern Company, Inc. (“MP”) to Produce Certain Documents (Doc. 58), and Defendant MP’s response thereto (Doc. 59), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Requests 37, 47, 48, and 49, to the extent responsive documents exist which have not been produced, limited to the period from November 7, 2004, to November 7, 2014, consistent with the attached Memorandum. In all other respects the motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ELIZABETH T. HEY _____________________________ ELIZABETH T. HEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?