REHMEYER v. PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION et al
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT MODEL PATTERN COMPANY, INC. ("MP") TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [#58] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO REQUESTS 37,47,48, AND 49, TO THE EXTENT RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS EXIST WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN PRODUCED, LIMITED TO THE PERIOD FROM 11/7/04 TO 11/7/14, CONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/4/17. 10/5/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOANNE REHMEYER
:
:
:
:
:
v.
PEAKE PLASTICS CORPORATION, et al
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-5690
ORDER
AND NOW, this _4th__ day of October 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s
motion to compel Defendant Model Pattern Company, Inc. (“MP”) to Produce Certain
Documents (Doc. 58), and Defendant MP’s response thereto (Doc. 59), IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
The motion is GRANTED as to Requests 37, 47, 48, and 49, to the extent
responsive documents exist which have not been produced, limited to the period from
November 7, 2004, to November 7, 2014, consistent with the attached Memorandum. In
all other respects the motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ELIZABETH T. HEY
_____________________________
ELIZABETH T. HEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?