TAKSIR et al v. THE VANGUARD GROUP

Filing 17

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS OTHERWISE DENIED. DEFENDANT SHALL ANSWER THE REMAINING CLAIM IN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/26/2017. 5/26/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ ALEX TAKSIR and ORIT TAKSIR, : on behalf of themselves and all others : similarly situated, : Plaintiffs, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5713 : THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC., : Defendant. : ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of May 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11), the briefing in support thereof, and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs’ claim under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (Count II) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is otherwise DENIED. Defendant shall answer the remaining claim in Plaintiffs’ Complaint no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?