RICHARDSON v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF SEEKS A REMAND TO THE ACTING COMMISSIOENR OF SOCIAL S ECURITY AND DENIED IN ALL OTHER ASPECTS; THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/14/17. 8/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAMILLE ANGELIQUE RICHARDSON,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Request for
Review (Document No. 10, filed February 9, 2017), the record in this case, the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, dated July 27,
2017, no objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra
Moore Wells, dated July 27, 2017, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED to the extent plaintiff seeks a
remand to the Acting Commissioner of Social Security and DENIED in all other respects;
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further
proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Carol Sandra Moore Wells, dated July 27, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security On January 21, 2017.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill is substituted
for Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?