ITUAH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS, (ECF NOS. 6 & 12 ), ARE GRANTED; ITUAHS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED; THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/15/17. 5/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’
motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 6 & 12), and Plaintiff Ituah’s responses, (ECF Nos. 15 &
19), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 6 & 12), are GRANTED;
2. Ituah’s claims are DISMISSED;4
3. This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
To the extent Ituah’s claims are barred by Rooker-Feldman, the Court dismisses them
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, the Court dismisses with
prejudice those claims that do not implicate Rooker-Feldman but are nonetheless barred by res
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?