ITUAH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS, (ECF NOS. 6 & 12 ), ARE GRANTED; ITUAHS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED; THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/15/17. 5/15/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ABRAHAM ITUAH,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-05772

v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’
motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 6 & 12), and Plaintiff Ituah’s responses, (ECF Nos. 15 &
19), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 6 & 12), are GRANTED;
2. Ituah’s claims are DISMISSED;4
3. This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

To the extent Ituah’s claims are barred by Rooker-Feldman, the Court dismisses them
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, the Court dismisses with
prejudice those claims that do not implicate Rooker-Feldman but are nonetheless barred by res
judicata.
4