JOHN DOE I et al v. WOLF et al

Filing 80

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 61 ) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 65 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/10/2019. 1/11/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN DOE I, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-6039

v.
COLONEL ROBERT EVANCHICK, in his
Official Capacity as Acting Commissioner of
the Pennsylvania State Police
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of January 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 61), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 65),
Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion (Doc. No. 69), Defendant’s Response in
Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 71), Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 72), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this
day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 61) is DENIED;
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 65) is GRANTED;
3. Judgment shall be entered in favor of DEFENDANT; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J