PULOTOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Filing
24
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED FOR LACK MATTER JURISICTION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 2/16/18. 2/16/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NEMAT PULOTOV,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-6067
v.
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
SERVICES et al,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of February 2018, upon consideration of the Complaint (Doc.
No. 1); Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13); Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14); Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15); Defendants’ Response in Opposition
to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16); the arguments of counsel for the
parties at the October 12, 2017 hearing; and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is
it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED.
3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED.
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J o el H . S l o ms k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?