TWIN GROCERY v. DEEGAN et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT GOVERNMENTS MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 6) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS ROBERT T. DEEGAN AND TOM VILSACK ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED AND "MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL" (DOC. 8) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/31/17. 5/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : TWIN GROCERY, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : : v. : No. 16-6151 : ROBERT T. DEEGAN, et al., : Defendants. : : ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, upon consideration of “The Government’s Motion to Dismiss in Part and for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 6) and “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel” (Doc. No. 8), it is hereby ORDERED that:  “The Government’s Motion to Dismiss in Part and for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED;  Defendants Robert T. Deegan and Tom Vilsack are DISMISSED with prejudice;  JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the United States and against Plaintiff;  The Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter CLOSED; and  “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel” (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED as moot. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ______________________________ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?