GOCHIN v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 5/17/2017. 5/17/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DIANE R. GOCHIN v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 16-6153 ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the Government’s Statement of Interest, 1 Defendants Thomas Jefferson University and Carianne Torrissi, Esquire’s Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants’ Motions (Documents 3 & 5) are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Document 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark the above-captioned case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, J. 1 On January 23, 2017, the Government filed a Statement of Interest, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517, moving the Court to sua sponte dismiss all claims against the federal Defendants. As discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court construes the Statement of Interest as a Motion to Dismiss.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?