SHARPE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE WILL BE CONDUCTED IN DUE COURSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 9/1/17. 9/5/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHIRLEY D. SHARPE, and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
NO. 16-6256
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, and
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of September 2017, upon consideration of Midland Credit
Management, Inc., and Midland Funding, LLC’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) (Document No. 12, filed May 30, 2017), Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document No. 17, filed June 16, 2017), and
Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants, Midland Credit Management, Inc., and
Midland Funding, LLC’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c)
(Document No. 20, filed June 29, 2017), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated
September 1, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a scheduling conference by telephone will be
conducted in due course.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.