GILBERT v. KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT CLAIM IN COUNT I. DEFEN DANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFFS PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS ACT CLAIMS IN COUNTS II, III, AND IV. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/24/18. 10/25/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, ) Modified on 10/25/2018 (md).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DARRYL GILBERT,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-6602

v.
KIMBERLY-CLARK PENNSYLVANIA,
LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant KimberlyClark Pennsylvania, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28), Plaintiff Darryl
Gilbert’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 32), and in
accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART
as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is DENIED on Plaintiff’s
Americans with Disabilities Act claim in Count I.
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED on Plaintiff’s
Pennsylvania Human Relations Act claims in Counts II, III, and IV.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.