GILBERT v. KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT CLAIM IN COUNT I. DEFEN DANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28 ) IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFFS PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS ACT CLAIMS IN COUNTS II, III, AND IV. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/24/18. 10/25/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, ) Modified on 10/25/2018 (md).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRYL GILBERT, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-6602 v. KIMBERLY-CLARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant KimberlyClark Pennsylvania, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28), Plaintiff Darryl Gilbert’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 32), and in accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is DENIED on Plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act claim in Count I. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED on Plaintiff’s Pennsylvania Human Relations Act claims in Counts II, III, and IV. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?