JOHNSON v. KEYSTONE QUALIT7Y TRANSPORT COMPANY et al

Filing 70

ORDER THAT KEYSTONE'S MOTION IN LIMINE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. EVIDENCE OF CHARLES LANE'S CONVICTIONS FOR THE CRIMES OUTLINED HEREIN IS ADMISSIBLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPEACHMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 609. EVIDENCE OF THE CHARLES LANE'S CONVICTIONS FOR CRIMES OUTLINED HEREIN IS INADMISSIBLE. EVIDENCE OF PAMELA JOHNSON'S 2004 CONVICTION FOR THEFT IS ADMISSIBLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPEACHMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 609.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/6/2018. 2/6/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAMELA JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-6603

v.
KEYSTONE QUALITY TRANSPORT
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2018, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Keystone’s Motion in Limine (ECF No. 68) is DENIED without prejudice.
2. Evidence of Charles Lane’s convictions for the following crimes is ADMISSIBLE
for purposes of impeachment pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 609:
a. 2008 conviction for theft by unlawful taking in violation of 18 Pa. C. S. §
3921 (Bucks County, CP-09-CR-0008211-2006, Disposition Date 1/8/08);
b. 2008 conviction for theft by receiving stolen property in violation of 18 Pa.
C. S. § 3925 (Bucks County, CP-09-CR-0008211-2006, Disposition Date
1/8/08);
c. 2008 conviction for tampering with records or identification in violation of
18 Pa. C.S. § 4104 A (Bucks County, CP-09-CR-0008211-2006, Disposition
Date 1/8/08); and
d. 2008 conviction for theft by deception-false impression, in violation of 18
Pa. C.S. § 3922(a)(1) (Bucks County, CP-09-CR-0008211-2006, Disposition
Date 1/8/08).

1

3. Evidence of Charles Lane’s convictions for the following crimes is
INADMISSBLE:
a. 1990 conviction for theft by unlawful taking in violation of 18 Pa. C. S. §
3921 (Philadelphia County, MC-51-CR-0926601-1990, Disposition Date
12/10/90);
b. Three 1990 convictions for theft by receiving stolen property in violation
of 18 Pa. C. S. § 3925 (Philadelphia County, CP-51-CR-1110601-1990,
Disposition Date 11/29/1990; Philadelphia County, MC-51-CR-09266011990, Disposition Date 12/10/90); and
c. 1991 conviction for burglary in violation of 18 Pa. C.S. § 3502
(Philadelphia County, CP-51-CR-1230021-1990, Disposition Date 1/2/91).
4. Evidence of Pamela Johnson’s 2004 conviction for theft by receiving stolen
property in violation of 18 Pa. C. S. § 3925 (Philadelphia County, CP-51-CR0402151-2004, Disposition Date 6/4/04) is ADMISSIBLE for purposes of
impeachment pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 609.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

2