BROWN v. BROWN et al

Filing 7

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/19/2017. 07/20/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(nds)

Case 2:16-cv-06707-ER Document 5-1 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1of1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

MARTIN BROWN,
Petitioner,

v.
N0.16-6707

ROBERT GILMORE, et al.,1
Respondents.
ORDER

AND NOW, this

day of

, 2017, upon

careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

llJ\_

t-1\~

IEDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
1

J.

I have substituted the superintendent of the State Correctional Instituti;n - Greene as
the respondent in this case. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 2 (requiring the
current custodian to be named as respondent).