BROWN v. BROWN et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/19/2017. 07/20/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(nds)
Case 2:16-cv-06707-ER Document 5-1 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1of1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT GILMORE, et al.,1
AND NOW, this
, 2017, upon
careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
IEDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
I have substituted the superintendent of the State Correctional Instituti;n - Greene as
the respondent in this case. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 2 (requiring the
current custodian to be named as respondent).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?