GREEN et al v. COSBY
Filing
28
ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF NO. 27) that. WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.'S MOTION TO QUASH A SUBPOENA (ECF NO. 1) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS:.... THE MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY OF AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. (ECF NO. 10) IS GRANTED.. TROIANI MUST NOT DISCLOSE ANY PORTION OF THE CASE FILE UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT.2(footnote). SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 3/21/2016. 3/21/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TAMARA GREEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
ORDER
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-mc-2
AND NOW, this _21st _ day of ___March, 2016, it is ORDERED that:
William H. Cosby, Jr.’s Motion to Quash a Subpoena (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part as follows:
o Cosby’s motion to quash is DENIED as to materials in Troiani’s case file pertaining
to Plaintiffs and the other witnesses,1 excluding attorney-client communication and
attorney work-product.
o Cosby’s motion to quash is GRANTED as to the Confidential Settlement
Agreement and General Release and materials in Troiani’s case file that do not
pertain to Plaintiffs or the other witnesses.
The Motion to Quash or Modify of American Media, Inc. (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.
Troiani MUST NOT DISCLOSE any portion of the case file until further order of the
Court.2
s/Anita B. Brody
________________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:
Copies MAILED on _______ to:
1
Consistent with the memorandum, the other witnesses refers to women who accused Cosby of sexual assault and
were investigated as potential witnesses in the Constand Litigation.
2
A review of Troiani’s entire case file is necessary to determine the portions of the file that should be disclosed
consistent with the subpoena, the memorandum, and this order.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?