DANIELS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 18

ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 9) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE THAT THE CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA AND CHARLES RAMSEY ARE DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/8/17. 11/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL DANIELS,
Plaintiff,

v.

CIVIL ACTION NO.

17-011~
I

\fl LED

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.

.Jov

.4 • T

ORDER

.

-8 20\7
t(MA,N,Cler\i.

AA1E. SAA

De?· c~~11~

AND NOW, this 8th day of November 2017, upon consideration ofthe~f1oiiTo"-'"
I

Dismiss filed by Defendants the City of Philadelphia and Charles Ramsey [Doc. Nol 9], and the
I

response thereto [Doc. No. 16], it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss'[Doc. No. 9]
is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Counts 2 through 10. These
counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
b. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Counts 1 and 11.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Philadelphia and Charles Ramsey are

DISMISSED as Defendants.
It is so ORDERED.

P1rQ-,
I
I

!