DANIELS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 9) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE THAT THE CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA AND CHARLES RAMSEY ARE DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/8/17. 11/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
.4 • T
AND NOW, this 8th day of November 2017, upon consideration ofthe~f1oiiTo"-'"
Dismiss filed by Defendants the City of Philadelphia and Charles Ramsey [Doc. Nol 9], and the
response thereto [Doc. No. 16], it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss'[Doc. No. 9]
is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Counts 2 through 10. These
counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
b. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Counts 1 and 11.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Philadelphia and Charles Ramsey are
DISMISSED as Defendants.
It is so ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?