RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Filing
188
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 8/19/21. 8/20/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
Case 2:17-cv-00266-DS Document 188 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
:
:
v.
:
:
SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC., et al :
CIVIL ACTION
RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
CIVIL ACTION
v.
TRITON MARINE CONTRUCTION
CORP.
:
:
:
:
:
:
NO. 15-921
NO. 17-266
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2021, following upon our review of Defendants’
Triton Marine Construction Corporation (“Triton”), TranSystems Corporation (TranSystems”),
and Shoreline Foundation, Inc. (“Shoreline”) “Joint Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s
Order of July 2, 2021 Granting Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Preclude Defendants’ Expert DM
Consulting/John Vitzthum,” (Civ. No. 17-266, Doc. 181) and Plaintiffs’ Rhoads Industries, Inc.
and Rhoads Marine Industries, Inc. (collectively “Rhoads”) Response in Opposition (Doc. 183),
for the reasons set out in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendants’ request for reconsideration is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ David R. Strawbridge, USMJ
DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?