HOBAN v. LANE et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/7/19. 1/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00441-JLS Document 14-1 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA . . CIVIIJ At:TION . .. ANTHONY HOBAN~ Petitioner, NO. v. 17-cv-441 Kr '" n,.r:~1~ i;:,:~. · 5;_ _~_.;,..:·:.,r) Gsrl<. JAY LANE, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 7 15> day of Jfa,vA0r.20J'l, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. ,+ovJh;·h o~:~t.-<-·f'l .,;ert \':\t:d Sitars ~TIS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: J. EN1'0 JAN O8 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?