TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS
Filing
81
ORDER DENYING 60 AND 61 MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/3/19. 9/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA,
INC., et al.,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-0452
Plaintiffs,
v.
SPIRIDON SPIREAS,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of September 2019, upon consideration of Defendant Spiridon
Spireas’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60), Defendant Spiridon Spireas, Ph.D.’s
Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Money Had and Received Claim Based on Alleged
False Pretenses (Doc. No. 61), Plaintiff Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.’s Omnibus
Opposition to Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64), Defendant’s Reply
Briefs in support of the Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 68, 69), Defendant’s
Supplemental Brief in Support of his Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 76), Plaintiff’s
Supplemental Brief in Further Support of its Omnibus Opposition to Defendant’s Motions for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 77), the arguments made by counsel for the parties at the hearing
on the Motions for Summary Judgment held on July 2, 2019, and in accordance with the Opinion
issued by the Court on this day, it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED.
1
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Money Had and Received
Claim Based on Alleged False Pretenses (Doc. No. 61) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?