MCCAFFREY v. WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT WINDSOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY'S (WPMC'S) MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF STEPFANIE MCCAFFREY'S NEW BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO WPMC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT.NO.43, IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL STRIKE THE BRIEF PLAINTIFF FILED AT DOCKET NUMBER 41-1; WPMC'S MOTION TO RENEW ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT. NO.44, IS GRANTED; WPMC'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, DKT.NO.36, IS DENIED; WPMC'S RENEWED MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE TO ISSUE A SUMMONS, DKT. NO.37, IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RE-SERVE WPMC, DKT.NO.40, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL EFFECTUATE SERVICE ON WPMC IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 4 OF THE FRCP WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 11/15/17. 11/15/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al.
AND NOW, this 15th
day of November, 2017, it is ORDERED that, consistent with the
accompanying memorandum of law:
Defendant Windsor Property Management Company’s (WPMC’s) motion to
strike plaintiff Stepfanie McCaffrey’s new brief in opposition to WPMC’s motion
to dismiss, Dkt. No. 43, is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE the
brief plaintiff filed at docket number 41-1;
WPMC’s motion to renew its reply in support of its motion to dismiss, Dkt. No.
44, is GRANTED;
WPMC’s renewed motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, Dkt. No. 36, is
WPMC’s renewed motion to strike plaintiff’s praecipe to issue a summons, Dkt.
No. 37, is DENIED;
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to re-serve WPMC, Dkt. No. 40, is
GRANTED. Plaintiff shall effectuate service on WPMC in accordance with Rule
4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within fourteen days of the date of this
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Judge
In deciding WPMC’s motion to dismiss, the Court considered plaintiff’s
previously filed opposition and brief in opposition, Dkt. Nos. 16 and 18, and WPMC’s
previously filed reply, Dkt. No. 20, which was re-filed at docket number 44-1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?