HUKMAN v. US AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES et al
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 93) IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. ON ALL CLAIMS IN HUKMAN'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. HUKMAN'S MOTION FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 95) IS DENIED. HUKMAN'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. 104) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. HUKMAN'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 116) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/25/19. 3/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHEIDA HUKMAN
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
US AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES,
et al.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 17-741
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary
Judgment filed by Defendant American Airlines, Inc., listed as US Airways/American Airlines on
the docket, pro se Plaintiff Sheida Hukman’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Hukman’s Motion
for Relief Under 60(b), which the Court construes as supplemental briefing to her Motion for
Summary Judgment, Hukman’s Motion to Strike, the responses thereto, and the parties’
presentations at the August 16, 2018, oral argument, and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1.
American Airlines, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 93) is
GRANTED and Judgment is entered in favor of American Airlines, Inc. on all
claims in Hukman’s Third Amended Complaint;
2.
Hukman’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 95) is DENIED;
3.
Hukman’s Motion in Limine (Document 104) is DISMISSED as moot; and
4.
Hukman’s Motion to Strike (Document 116) is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez .
Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?