STREEPER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Filing 19

ORDER THAT THE COURT WILL EXTEND THE TIME DUE FOR PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS TO 2/12/24. DEFENDANTS MAY FILE A REPLY BRIEF BY 2/20/24; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/31/24. 2/1/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RASHEED PHILLIPS
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
JENNIFER STREEPER
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
ELIGA McGHEE and NATHANIEL
McGHEE
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
DENNIS SHARPE
v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-609
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-787
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-832

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 19-983

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
ORDER
AND NOW this 31st day of January, 2024, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
Memorandum, Plaintiffs’ counsel, in their responses to the Motions to Dismiss, shall, in addition
to their contentions as to the statute of limitations, show cause as to why the cases should not be
dismissed because of the long delay from the filing of the Complaint until this reassignment.
The Court will extend the time due for Plaintiffs’ responses to the Motions to Dismiss to
February 12, 2024. Defendants may file a reply brief by February 20, 2024.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
United States District Court Judge

O:\CIVIL 16\16-609 Phillips v City\Order on Memorandum on 4 NFU cases.docx