TINGEY v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD et al

Filing 47

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS, DAGE GARDNER AND CAITLIN MCLAUGHLIN, AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, MARK TINGEY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/12/19. 12/13/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARK TINGEY,

CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,

v.
PROBATION OFFICER DAGE
GARDNER, and
SUPERVISING PROBATION OFFICER
CAITLIN McLAUGHLIN,
Defendants.

NO. 17-827

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants’ [sic]
Dage Gardner and Caitlin McLaughlin[’s] Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 36,
filed April 26, 2019), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s [sic] Motion for Summary Judgment
(Document No. 39, filed June 3, 2019), Defendants’ [sic] Dage Gardner and Caitlin
McLaughlin[’s] Sur-Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
(Document No. 42, filed June 17, 2019), and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Supplemental
Disputed Material Facts in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 43,
June 17, 2019), for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum dated December 12,
2019, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ [sic] Dage Gardner and Caitlin McLaughlin[’s]
Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in FAVOR of
defendants, Dage Gardner and Caitlin McLaughlin, AGAINST plaintiff, Mark Tingey.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall MARK the case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.