DIMATTEO v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO REHIRE HIM AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT TERMINATING HIS EMPLOYMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 11/15/2017. 11/15/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NICHOLAS DIMATTEO, JR.,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
PHILADELPHIA,
Defendant.

NO. 17-0898

ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff’s Response thereto (ECF No. 16), and
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 17), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s
Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1.

Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA

claims are premised on Defendant’s failure to rehire him, and
2.

Defendant’s Motion is DENIED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA

claims are premised on Defendant terminating his employment.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.