DIMATTEO v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO REHIRE HIM AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT TERMINATING HIS EMPLOYMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 11/15/2017. 11/15/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLAS DIMATTEO, JR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant. NO. 17-0898 ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff’s Response thereto (ECF No. 16), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 17), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA claims are premised on Defendant’s failure to rehire him, and 2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA claims are premised on Defendant terminating his employment. BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?