SNYDER et al v. HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM et al
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT, HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. D/B/A HOLY REDEEMER HOSPITAL TO DISMISS AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 2/7/18. 2/7/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KAREN SNYDER, CHERYL
ROBINSON-KELLY, BARBARA
FREDERICI and KIMBERLY NIEDRIST,
Individually and on Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated
v.
HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM,
d/b/a HOLY REDEEMER HOSPITAL,
THE HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH
SYSTEM PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE
and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-960
ORDER
NOW, this 7th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion of
Defendant, Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc. d/b/a Holy Redeemer Hospital, to
Dismiss Amended Class Action Complaint (Document No. 13), the plaintiffs’ response,
and the defendants’ reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1.
To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction, it is DENIED.
2.
To the extent the motion seeks dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), it is
converted to a motion for summary judgment.
/s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?