CUTLER v. GREEN et al

Filing 40

ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS BY PLAINTIFF JEFFREY CUTLER ARE DENIED (1) MOTION TO COMBINE CASES AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DKT. NO. 21 ; (2) MOTION TO COMBINE CASES AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DKT. NO. 32 ; (3) MOTION TO COMBINE CASES AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT , DKT. NO. 35 ; AND (4) MOTION TO COMBINE CASES AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DKT. NO. 37 ; DEFENDANT RALPH HUTCHINSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT. NO. 14 , IS GRANTED; DEFENDANT HONORABLE MARGARET MILLER'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT. NO. 19 , IS GRAN TED; THE MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS AMBER GREEN AND CHRISTINA HAUSNER, DKT. NO. 34 , IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/10/17. 7/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY CUTLER v. AMBER GREEN, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-984 ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2017, it is ORDERED that, consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law: 1. the following motions by plaintiff Jeffrey Cutler are DENIED: (1) motion to combine cases (2:17-cv-00984) and summary judgment, Dkt. No. 21; (2) motion to combine cases (1:17-cv-02726) and summary judgment, Dkt. No. 32; (3) motion to combine cases (0:16-cv-61511) and summary judgment, Dkt. No. 35; and (4) motion to combine cases (1:17-cv-01074) and default judgment, Dkt. No. 37; 2. defendant Ralph Hutchinson’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 14, is GRANTED; 3. defendant Honorable Margaret Miller’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 19, is GRANTED; 4. the motion to dismiss by defendants Amber Green and Christina Hausner, Dkt. No. 34, is GRANTED; 5. plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED in their entirety; and 6. the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?