QUINTANA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 52

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC NOS. 38&42) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/30/18. 7/31/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOEL QUINTANA a/k/a CHRISTOPHER SANDLE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION No. 17-0996 v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2018, after consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, (ECF Nos. 38 & 42), Plaintiff’s Responses, (ECF Nos. 48 & 49), and Nordo’s Reply (ECF No. 50), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 1. Count I for malicious prosecution under § 1983 is DISMISSED against the City of Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Police Department, Richard Ross, Jeffrey Schmidt, Sean Matrascez, John Cole, Timothy Miller, Samuel Hudson, Thomas Matinka, and the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office; 2. Count II for conspiracy is DISMISSED against all defendants; 3. Count III under Monell is DISMISSED against all defendants; 4. Count VI for malicious prosecution under state law is DISMISSED against the City of Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Police Department, Richard Ross, Jeffrey Schmidt, Sean Matrascez, John Cole, Timothy Miller, Samuel Hudson, Thomas Matinka, and the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office; and, 5. Count VII for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress is DISMISSED against all defendants. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?