ROBINSON v. SMITH et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITIONER FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 7/10/18. 7/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CURRY ROBINSON

:
:
v.
:
:
BARRY SMITH, Superintendent, THE
:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE :
OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT
:
ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY :

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 17-1023

ORDER
NOW, this 10th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1-1), the response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne
A. Sitarski (Document No. 19), and the petitioner=s objections to the Report and
Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is
ORDERED that:
1.

The petitioner=s objections are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski is

APPROVED and ADOPTED;1
3.

The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

/s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE

1

The Magistrate Judge=s recitation of the factual and procedural history is accurate. Her legal analysis is
thorough and correct. Therefore, we can add nothing to the well-reasoned and exhaustive report.