LEWIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Filing
17
ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 15) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. 11) IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/20/17. 12/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DIANE LEWIS
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 17-1111
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff Diane
Lewis’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review and the Commissioner
of Social Security’s response thereto, and after careful and independent review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, to which no objections
have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED:
•
The Report and Recommendation (Document 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
•
Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Document 11) is DENIED;
•
Judgment is entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security;
and
•
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
1
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on November 22, 2017,
together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any
objections within fourteen days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b)
(“Any party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report
under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy
thereof.”). As of today’s date, no objections have been filed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?