IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 11

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (DOC. 5 ) (COUNT II) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMEN DED COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FORTY-FOUR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM IN COURT I. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/4/2017. 10/4/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN IRVING, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1124 v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1), Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations of Bad Faith from Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 6), Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 7), and in accordance with the Court’s Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations of Bad Faith from the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 5) (Count II) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff is given thirty (20) days from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint. 3. Defendant is ORDERED to respond to an Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of Plaintiff filing an Amended Complaint or, should Plaintiff elect not to file an Amended Complaint, within forty-four (34) days from the date of this Order to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s claim in Count I. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y_ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?