CALA DIAMONDS, LLC v. HRA GROUP HOLDINGS et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT HRA USA LTD IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(2) AND COUNTS I, II, V AND VI ARE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/21/17. 9/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CALA DIAMONDS, LLC, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff : : vs. : NO. 17-CV-1136 : HRA GROUP HOLDINGS, ITAY ARIEL,: CROSSWORKS MANUFACTURING LTD., : HRA USA LTD, and : MICHELLE SEGOLY, : : Defendants : ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. Nos. 11 and 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto, and Defendants’ Reply Brief in Further Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Defendant HRA USA Ltd is DISMISSED from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Counts I, II, V and VI are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, the Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/J. Curtis Joyner J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?