CALA DIAMONDS, LLC v. HRA GROUP HOLDINGS et al
Filing
21
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT HRA USA LTD IS DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(2) AND COUNTS I, II, V AND VI ARE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/21/17. 9/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CALA DIAMONDS, LLC,
:
: CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff
:
:
vs.
: NO. 17-CV-1136
:
HRA GROUP HOLDINGS, ITAY ARIEL,:
CROSSWORKS MANUFACTURING LTD., :
HRA USA LTD, and
:
MICHELLE SEGOLY,
:
:
Defendants
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this
21st
day of September, 2017, upon
consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc.
Nos. 11 and 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto, and
Defendants’ Reply Brief in Further Support, it is hereby ORDERED
that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Defendant
HRA USA Ltd is DISMISSED from this action pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Counts I, II, V and VI are DISMISSED
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, the Motion
is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?