PALLANTE v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON

Filing 61

ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 56 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (DOC. # 55 ) AGAINST PLAINTIFF ROSSA PALLANTE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/21/18. 8/21/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSSA PALLANTE v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1142 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the accompany memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. # 55) against plaintiff Rossa Pallante is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and against plaintiff Rossa Pallante on defendant’s counterclaim of common law fraud. 2) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and against plaintiff Rossa Pallante on defendant’s counterclaim of fraud under the New Jersey Fraud Prevention Act, N.J.S.A. §§ 17:33A, et seq. 3) The homeowners insurance policy # WMPH00826 issued to plaintiff Rossa Pallante by defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London is rescinded ab initio. 4) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and against plaintiff Rossa Pallante in the amount of $361,767.16, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $45,345.15, for a total of $407,112.31. 5) The motion of defendant Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London for summary judgment against plaintiff Rossa Pallante as to its claim for a declaratory judgment is DENIED as a matter of law and that claim is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?