SPEARS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS TO REMAND THESE ACTIONS TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ARE DENIED ADN THE COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ANN REDFIELD ARE DISMISS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/26/17. 5/26/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JORJA BENTLEY v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ ROY HAGER v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ PHILLIP DIVERGIGELIS v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ RONALD BURTON v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ STEPHEN TSOPANIS v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ WANDA YOUNG v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1122 ___________________________ NO. 17-1331 ___________________________ NO. 17-1333 ___________________________ NO. 17-1334 ___________________________ NO. 17-1335 ___________________________ NO. 17-1336 ___________________________ DOROTHY SPEARS v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ VICKI LING v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ DARLENE HARRIS v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ ELIZABETH BANJACK v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. _____________________________ : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1337 ___________________________ NO. 17-1338 ___________________________ NO. 17-1339 ___________________________ NO. 17-1340 ___________________________ ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions of plaintiffs to remand these actions to the -2- Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 1 are DENIED and the complaints against defendant Ann Redfield are DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J. 1. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. C.A. No. No. No. No. No. 17-1122 17-1333 17-1335 17-1337 17-1339 (Doc. (Doc. (Doc. (Doc. (Doc. # # # # # 11); C.A. No. 17-1331 (Doc. # 9); 9); C.A. No. 17-1334 (Doc. # 9); 9); C.A. No. 17-1336 (Doc. # 9); 9); C.A. No. 17-1338 (Doc. # 9); 9); C.A. No. 17-1340 (Doc. # 9). -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?