HARRIS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
Filing
22
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS TO REMAND THESE ACTIONS TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ARE DENIED ADN THE COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ANN REDFIELD ARE DISMISS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/26/2017. 5/26/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES, E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JORJA BENTLEY
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
ROY HAGER
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
PHILLIP DIVERGIGELIS
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
RONALD BURTON
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
STEPHEN TSOPANIS
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
WANDA YOUNG
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-1122
___________________________
NO. 17-1331
___________________________
NO. 17-1333
___________________________
NO. 17-1334
___________________________
NO. 17-1335
___________________________
NO. 17-1336
___________________________
DOROTHY SPEARS
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
VICKI LING
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
DARLENE HARRIS
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
ELIZABETH BANJACK
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.
_____________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-1337
___________________________
NO. 17-1338
___________________________
NO. 17-1339
___________________________
NO. 17-1340
___________________________
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2017, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that the motions of plaintiffs to remand these actions to the
-2-
Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 1 are DENIED and the
complaints against defendant Ann Redfield are DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.
1. C.A.
C.A.
C.A.
C.A.
C.A.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
17-1122
17-1333
17-1335
17-1337
17-1339
(Doc.
(Doc.
(Doc.
(Doc.
(Doc.
#
#
#
#
#
11); C.A. No. 17-1331 (Doc. # 9);
9); C.A. No. 17-1334 (Doc. # 9);
9); C.A. No. 17-1336 (Doc. # 9);
9); C.A. No. 17-1338 (Doc. # 9);
9); C.A. No. 17-1340 (Doc. # 9).
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?