ANDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Filing
8
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AND; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 6/7/17. 6/8/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
MAJOR ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
FILED
v.
NO. 17-1429
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondent.
JUN -7 2017
KATE BARKMAN, Clerk
By
Dep. Clerk
ORDER
AND NOW, this
11""
\)
~
~Cl\ l_
day of
'1
, 2017, upon careful and
independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, available state court records,
and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R.
Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that a reasonable jurist
would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and
4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this ca
WENDY BEETLESTONE,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?