BROWN v. UNITED STATES et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 6) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFFS COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 9) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/6/18. 2/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BLANCHE A. BROWN,
UNITED STATES, ET AL.,
AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 6), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition and Countermotion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 9), Defendants’ Reply and Response in Opposition to
the Counter-motion (Doc. No. 10), and Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART:
Count 15 of the Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6);
Counts 1–3 and 5–14 of the Complaint are dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1);
Count 4 of the Complaint is dismissed against all Defendants EXCEPT
Defendant United States of America.
Plaintiff’s Counter-motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?