MILLER v. BERRYHILL

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED. THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER DENYING DISABILITY BENEFITS TO PLFF IS VACATED. PLFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 5 AT 21) IS GRANTED; & THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE CO MMISIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. SEC. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 8/29/18. 8/30/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
.. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JENNIFER LYNN MILLER, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 17-1575 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this __:J..q~ day of August, 2018, upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs Brief and Statement oflssues in Support of Request for Review~Doc. 5), Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 5 at 21), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff(Doc. 6), Plaintiffs Brief in Reply to Defendant's Brief in Response to Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. 7), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge (Doc. 11 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The final decision ofthe Commissioner denying disability benefits to Plaintiff is VACATED; 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 5 at 21) is GRANTED; and 4. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 C.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the :vfagistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned matter as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: lion. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?