DAVENPORT v. POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC et al

Filing 48

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC, JOSE ORTIZ AND RITA ANDREW'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF MAY PROCEED ON HIS INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIM AGAINST THE HOSPITAL, ORTIZ AND ANDREWS WHO SHALL ANSWER THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 10/20/17. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/6/17. 10/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RAYMOND SAMUEL DAVENPORT, III v. CIVIL ACTION N0.17-1616 POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC, et al. ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of October 2017, upon considering Defendants Pottstown Hospital Company, LLC, Jose Ortiz and Rita Andrews's Motion to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 39), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 43), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 46) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 39) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Plaintiffs ยง1983 claims against Jose Ortiz (Counts I and III) are dismissed with prejudice; 2. Plaintiffs negligence claim against Pottstown Hospital Company, LLC and Rita Andrews (Count VII) is dismissed; 3. Plaintiffs corporate negligence claim against the Hospital (Count VIII) is dismissed; and, 4. Plaintiff may proceed on his intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against the Hospital, Jose Ortiz and Rita Andrews (Count X) who shall answer the Second Amended Complaint on or before October 20, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?