HANDFIELD v. GARMAN et al

Filing 31

ORDER THAT PETITIONERS 26 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B) IS DENIED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/30/19. 9/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EARL C. HANDFIELD II, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1634 MARK GARMAN, et al, Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2019, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is DENIED; 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this matter; and 3. There is no cause to issue a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?