MCCARRIN v. POLLERA et al

Filing 27

ORDER: UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(3) AND (F) (ECF NO. 13), DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION THERETO, (ECF NO. 16) AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY, (ECF NO. 17), AND FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE M EMORANDUM FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(E) AND (F) (ECF NO. 13) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/30/2017. 11/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (rz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL W. McCARRIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARIO POLLERA, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No.:

17-cv-1691

ORDER
AND NOW, this

30th

day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s

Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(3) and (f) (ECF No. 13), Defendants’
response in opposition thereto, (ECF No. 16) and Plaintiff’s Reply, (ECF No. 17), and for the
reasons set forth in the memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) and (f)
(ECF No. 13) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lynne A. Sitarski
.
LYNNE A. SITARSKI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE