MCCARRIN v. POLLERA et al

Filing 27

ORDER: UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(3) AND (F) (ECF NO. 13), DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION THERETO, (ECF NO. 16) AND PLAINTIFFS REPLY, (ECF NO. 17), AND FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE M EMORANDUM FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(E) AND (F) (ECF NO. 13) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/30/2017. 11/30/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (rz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL W. McCARRIN, Plaintiff, v. MARIO POLLERA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No.: 17-cv-1691 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(3) and (f) (ECF No. 13), Defendants’ response in opposition thereto, (ECF No. 16) and Plaintiff’s Reply, (ECF No. 17), and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) and (f) (ECF No. 13) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski . LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?