MCCARRIN v. POLLERA et al

Filing 69

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44) IS GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTST POLLERA, FEENEY, LYONS AND NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINE EMPLOYEES UNION AND PHILADELPHIA PUBLISHERS PENSION PLAN AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MCCARRIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/27/19. 10/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL W. MCCARRIN Plaintiff, v. MARIO POLLERA. individually and as Union Trustee; TIMOTHY FEENEY, individually and as Union Trustee; JOSEPH LYONS, individually, and as Management Trustee; and, NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINE EMPLOYEES UNION AND PHILADELPHIA PUBLISHERS PENSION PLAN Defendants. : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1691 : ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of September 2019, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (ECF No. 46), and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 47), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants Pollera, Feeney, Lyons, and Newspaper and Magazine Employees Union and Philadelphia Publishers Pension Plan and against Plaintiff McCarrin. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones, II J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?