MCCARRIN v. POLLERA et al
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44) IS GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTST POLLERA, FEENEY, LYONS AND NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINE EMPLOYEES UNION AND PHILADELPHIA PUBLISHERS PENSION PLAN AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MCCARRIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/27/19. 10/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL W. MCCARRIN
Plaintiff,
v.
MARIO POLLERA. individually and as
Union Trustee; TIMOTHY FEENEY,
individually and as Union Trustee;
JOSEPH LYONS, individually,
and as Management Trustee; and,
NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINE
EMPLOYEES UNION AND
PHILADELPHIA PUBLISHERS
PENSION PLAN
Defendants.
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-1691
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of September 2019, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (ECF No. 46), and
Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 47), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants Pollera,
Feeney, Lyons, and Newspaper and Magazine Employees Union and Philadelphia Publishers
Pension Plan and against Plaintiff McCarrin.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?